Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 26 Jan 2019

      @wsscherk @realdeepdives @ScottAdamsSays @AtomsksSanakan @geoffmprice @luvkit Peter Hadfield's (potholer54) 2nd resp to contrarian Tony Heller. The better argument is how well the logic fits together and if the person cites evidence you can cross-check.https://youtu.be/weQ-N4iymrQ 

      13 replies 3 retweets 9 likes
    2. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 18 Feb 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @wsscherk and

      Re: "(potholer54) 2nd resp to contrarian Tony Heller" potholer debunking another contrarian (Ben Davidon, a.k.a. Suspicious0bservers, @TheRealS0s) in a series of videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfqOsuEIVI … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xS13WYen0k …https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUxIM67qt14 …

      1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
    3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @wsscherk and

      Looks like potholer54 has a full-time job knocking down the poorly formed arguments of critics that appear everywhere, sprouting up like weeds trying to induce inaction on the public.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. This Tweet is unavailable.
    5. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
      Replying to @wsscherk @AtomsksSanakan and

      I love it. I will send your video to potholer54 (if it hasn't got there yet) and will try my stab at it as well once you post the 5 top arguments. I disagree with you that the 3 arguments you presented on the AGW side are the best arguments. I never use the 97% argument.

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    6. This Tweet is unavailable.
    7. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 20 Feb 2019
      Replying to @wsscherk @JSegor and

      Re: "Guidance?" 2 main possibilities here: 1) They're asking for stuff that's already given in peer-reviewed papers [methods, results, etc.] 2) They're using the denialist tactic of asking for something virtually impossible (ex: send unprocessed data) http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/1874/1/How%20the%20growth%20of%20denialism%20undermines%20public%20health%20_%20The%20BMJ.pdf …pic.twitter.com/lxJ9cwCg0e

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    8. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @wsscherk and

      It is really sad that Heller has been given a platform on this channel when it has already been clearly demonstrated over and over that his critical claims have been debunked by qualified scientists. As a purely academic exercise in debate, it will be amusing.

      4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 20 Feb 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @AtomsksSanakan and

      Who would be more credible, and has not been debunked in your view?

      12:01 PM - 20 Feb 2019
      • 4 Likes
      • Lunch77 Kevin Watson Joel Neumann 🇺🇸 Kit
      6 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AtomsksSanakan and

          I know that Gavin S (NASA) has had arguments with Judith Curry on things she has said publicly at a high technical level but I found her to be much more informed, honest in her criticisms. People may disagree, but her arguments were more convincing when I was a skeptic.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and

          Heller is so transparent in his mistakes, it is a waste of time even considering him as a valid critic. When even the critics criticize a critic like Heller, you know you don't have the best on the critical side.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @wsscherk @ScottAdamsSays and

          Sure. But not a really serious debate, as potholer54 pointed out. The models work well, the empirical data is sound, and the physics and chemistry behind GHG is pretty much locked in. What is murky on the critics' side is how high is that ECS value? If it is low, we have time.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AtomsksSanakan and

          On the policy side, I think Bjorn Lomborg is interesting and he has teamed up with Nordhaus to present an economic plan for AGW. Even though potholer54 firmly debunked one of his videos on electric cars, at least Lomborg has presented a solution to the AGW problem.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and

          It would be interesting to contrast Nordhaus's plan for AGW with Paul Hawken's plan presented in his book "Drawdown". Hawken's book is extremely specific about AGW solutions as compared with the Green New Deal which is completely unrealistic at this point.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AtomsksSanakan and

          At the speed of YouTube, potholer54 has responded to the challenge:pic.twitter.com/wSwnR8JlUE

          3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
        3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and

          My only comment, if we are still debating the science, it is somewhat similar to arguing that Einstein's General Theory of Relativity is wrong. Most people can't comprehend the math behind it, yet it has been empirically confirmed. Same with AGW science. Debate is with policy.

          6 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Kit‏ @luvkit 20 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          I would agree with @JSegor, that Judith Curry would come up with the best rebuttals, at least the technical ones. I find Heller compelling when he points out tide gauges haven't changed, i.e. we still have the Maldives.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 25 Feb 2019
          Replying to @luvkit @ScottAdamsSays and

          Re: "I find Heller compelling when he points out tide gauges haven't changed, i.e. we still have the Maldives." 🤭 Sea level rise in the Maldives: https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014904101753227851 … https://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/014904102753516787 … https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.04.001 … https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818114000381 … https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a9e6/0707a00343326956545c51d6cd9879e68cde.pdf …pic.twitter.com/p0Ya7X4W1c

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info