Going live on Periscope now to induce cognitive dissonance in guest callers who oppose emergency border security funding.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Sets a horrible precedent no matter which way you lean politically. None of the 31 existing emergencies are for infrastructure funding that is non-disaster related. No-one knows about them for the same reasons no-one knows which steamships weren’t sunk by giant icebergs in 1912
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GKercheck
How “Emergency” are the existing 30+ emergencies that have been in operation for years?
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GKercheck
How many of those 30+ emergencies were the result of the failure to pass a spending bill, then have the president bypass congress because of his poor negotiating skills?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joemacmichen @GKercheck
How many of them saved American lives? Ask the right question, get the right answer.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GKercheck
I’ve got to hand it to you though, how you’re able to convince so many people that your opinion is worth more than the toilet paper I just wiped my ass with is mind boggling. Kudos
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joemacmichen @GKercheck
I’m sure your eight followers love you too.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Ah yes when no reasonable argument can be made resort to follower count like it’s dick size.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Did you hallucinate a debate that I was in?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.