If Congress ignores the recommendation of border experts without explaining their reasons to the public, they are spitting in the faces of voters. And if so, the Commander in Chief has a responsibility to do what experts recommend.https://twitter.com/MarkMeadows/status/1095170835688640512 …
-
-
Juliette Kayyem detailed what effective border security really entails. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dan-crenshaw-border-wall-security_us_5c59cfcfe4b0871047580656 … via
@HuffPostPol -
Her opinion seems irrational on the surface. She ignores the use of walls to focus resources.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
your hallucination is noted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One is a scientific theory (climate change), the other, is can more readily be proven. There are citizen murders, there are drugs stopped at the border when we are lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you think there is greater than 97% consensus among border experts that what is needed is a Wall?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shit. I used to love reading your challenging discussions. Now you can't even see your own hypocrisy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.