Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. ratman720  👨‍🔬 🏕 🌋 🧭 🏭 📉 🧪 🎮‏ @ratman720 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @geoffmprice and

      No I'm not checkmated. Bleaching is an adaptive response to any form of environmental stress. It is explicitly the expelling of current algal organisms and the subsequent reabsorption of more heat tolerant strains and has been occurring for centuries.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00283/full …

      1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
    2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @ratman720 @geoffmprice and

      A quote from the paper above: "... but reconstructed increases in bleaching frequency and prevalence, may suggest coral populations are reaching an upper bleaching threshold, a “tipping point” beyond which coral survival is uncertain."

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @ratman720 and

      Read paper again. Yes, bleaching has occurred for centuries, that is not the issue here. Extinctions have occurred for thousands of years. The point here is that the "prevalence & frequency indicate that we may be coming to a tipping point beyond which survival in uncertain."

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @ratman720 and

      This is a recurring theme in AGW. It is not the warming itself - it is the rate at which the warming is occurring which is stressing many diverse ecosystems to the point of failure to adapt. Hence all the research on making corals more resistant to heat. Good try, but no cookie.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. ratman720  👨‍🔬 🏕 🌋 🧭 🏭 📉 🧪 🎮‏ @ratman720 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @geoffmprice and

      And this argument is a recurring specious argument. You have no basis or empirical evidence for this claim it is solely constituted by your opinion and those of others with an equally baseless a stance.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. ratman720  👨‍🔬 🏕 🌋 🧭 🏭 📉 🧪 🎮‏ @ratman720 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @ratman720 @JSegor and

      Life adapts readily and e olutuo. Is continuous and rapid. If you want to make a claim you have to provide evidence not mere speculation.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Geoff Price‏ @geoffmprice 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @ratman720 @JSegor and

      I have a blog post that provides an overview of coral evidence and many links. Feel free to leave a comment if you're authentically interested.https://pressingwax.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/on-coral-alarmism/ …

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Geoff Price‏ @geoffmprice 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @geoffmprice @ratman720 and

      Your feed suggests you have a strong partisan identity (great). But you might therefore see it as more honorable to die on your sword than concede your clan has misguidedly hitched its wagon to a caravan of evidence-rejecting goofiness on this particular topic. Science ≠ enemy.

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @geoffmprice @ratman720 and

      My current view on climate change is that both sides of the debate are experiencing major confirmation bias. That much seems obvious. But I might have found a path to go deeper. That plan is in motion.

      4 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
    10. This Tweet is unavailable.
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 11 Feb 2019
      Replying to @wsscherk @geoffmprice and

      I observe that both sides are 100% persuasive when consumed in isolation.

      1:54 PM - 11 Feb 2019
      • 1 Retweet
      • 4 Likes
      • Ethan Allen Kevin Watson Lunch77 Twitt_Really_Itches
      7 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. ratman720  👨‍🔬 🏕 🌋 🧭 🏭 📉 🧪 🎮‏ @ratman720 11 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @wsscherk and

          The largest problem you will have is both sides talk at each other. The majority of the time each is attacking a straw man, and more often than not missing the others point. Id also offer that persuasion is only half the argument. Disuasion is the other half.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. ratman720  👨‍🔬 🏕 🌋 🧭 🏭 📉 🧪 🎮‏ @ratman720 11 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ratman720 @ScottAdamsSays and

          For instance I find emotional or subjective language to be disuasive. Which I find to be more pervasive on one side I also find the inability to converge on the magnitude of CO2, given claims of its dominance to be disuasive.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 11 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @wsscherk and

          However, even when you have opponents face-to-face, the conversation devolves into attacks on integrity (Curry vs. Schmidt). I think there is a lot at stake. There is a reality independent of either side. And it will make itself known.http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/07/the-montford-delusion/comment-page-4/#comment-181895 …

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 11 Feb 2019
          Replying to @wsscherk @ScottAdamsSays and

          This is called the "exaggerated minority". In this channel the vast majority of people are critics. Outside of this you have 21 + 30 + 21 at least engaged.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Geoff Price‏ @geoffmprice 11 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @wsscherk and

          This... just isn't so. Or how so, any specific claims? Unless you mean in the sense that most everything (say 9/11 Truth conspiracy theories) sort of kinda look good if you just scan arguments and don't critically fact check, looking for repeatable confirming evidence etc...?

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. This Tweet is unavailable.
        4. Show replies
        1. Som Mathur‏ @SoMathur 12 Feb 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @wsscherk and

          I've noticed that with pro-vaccine vs. anti-vaccine argument.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info