The altered data fits the theory. The measured data goes opposite the theory. Night and day difference between those two concepts.
-
-
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Are ocean temperature measurements "tampered"?
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
I don't know much about ocean temperatures, but Phil Jones at CRU said the historical ocean data was "largely made up." NASA did not even attempt to calculate pre-1950 ocean temperatures until about 15 years ago. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …pic.twitter.com/I6NDnaotmp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 25 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Meaning we do have ocean temperatures since 1950, which is all we need, and those are better than land measurements because 90% of alleged CO2 heat goes into oceans.
13 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeBara9 @SteveSGoddard and
Why are the bulk of catastrophe warnings about climate focused on oceans? Coral bleachin, floods, etc.
19 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @MikeBara9 and
Coral bleaching is a visual phenomenon with persuasive impact. Sea level rise is the largest theoretical risk but the there has been no acceleration and likely won't be over a foot by the end of the century. The ocean has more persuasive potential than land based effects.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeBara9 @ratman720 and
The theory does not predict rising sea levels everywhere in the near term. Some can rise (warmer oceans expand) while others do not.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.