The data fits the theory and that's bothering you?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The altered data fits the theory. The measured data goes opposite the theory. Night and day difference between those two concepts.
3 replies 12 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Are ocean temperature measurements "tampered"?
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
I don't know much about ocean temperatures, but Phil Jones at CRU said the historical ocean data was "largely made up." NASA did not even attempt to calculate pre-1950 ocean temperatures until about 15 years ago. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …pic.twitter.com/I6NDnaotmp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 25 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Meaning we do have ocean temperatures since 1950, which is all we need, and those are better than land measurements because 90% of alleged CO2 heat goes into oceans.
13 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dsmyxe @SteveSGoddard and
Proxies are sufficient for the distant past, and we have them. To measure industrial CO2 you need accuracy since 1950 for ocean data, which we have.
4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Because the top scientists in the world think it, and it makes sense on the surface that for historical stuff and long time periods you don't need so much precision. I wouldn't use proxies for 1960, for example.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The "so" tell for cognitive dissonance plus mind reading, plus word salad. That's as hard as anyone can lose a debate on Twitter.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.