Are ocean temperature measurements "tampered"?
-
-
I don't know much about ocean temperatures, but Phil Jones at CRU said the historical ocean data was "largely made up." NASA did not even attempt to calculate pre-1950 ocean temperatures until about 15 years ago. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …pic.twitter.com/I6NDnaotmp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 25 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Meaning we do have ocean temperatures since 1950, which is all we need, and those are better than land measurements because 90% of alleged CO2 heat goes into oceans.
13 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Global warming theory is based around warming of the troposphere. I am not aware of any mechanism by which scientists have claimed CO2 heats the oceans, and much of the sea surface is well below normal temperature. https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/sst/anomaly/2019/anomnight.2.11.2019.gif …pic.twitter.com/3OI4GT0RIM
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
5 replies 8 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Warm air doesn't warm water?
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Ocean heat content is controlled almost entirely by the amount of solar energy penetrating the surface of the water, and thus is controlled by cloudiness, The tiny change in troposphere temperatures has very little effect on the heat content of the ocean. http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/ …pic.twitter.com/ILW5HmESrc
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 9 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Is 2 degrees in twenty years, for example, a "very little effect"?
6 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
0.2 degrees.
3 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
The air gap in my understanding here is that climate scientists are more worried about the ocean than the troposphere. Evidently some of them think warmer air warms oceans.
23 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Both sides say the other's point is fraudulent, and do so with great persuasiveness. If you are only seeing the critics without the debunking of the critics, you are not participating.
-
-
One difference being that I am ready to debate them any time, while they shy from confrontation. They bluster from their safe echo chamber, but refuse to step out into the light.
5 replies 17 retweets 69 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Steve is right in this. Alarmists avoid honest two way debate because they know their nonsense will be debunked and their gravy train will come to a halt.
3 replies 7 retweets 21 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.