Scientists say it didn't happen. Adjustments went both ways.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The data fits the theory and that's bothering you?
6 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
The altered data fits the theory. The measured data goes opposite the theory. Night and day difference between those two concepts.
3 replies 12 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Are ocean temperature measurements "tampered"?
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
I don't know much about ocean temperatures, but Phil Jones at CRU said the historical ocean data was "largely made up." NASA did not even attempt to calculate pre-1950 ocean temperatures until about 15 years ago. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …pic.twitter.com/I6NDnaotmp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 25 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Meaning we do have ocean temperatures since 1950, which is all we need, and those are better than land measurements because 90% of alleged CO2 heat goes into oceans.
13 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
Scott this is nonsense. The ARGO buoys, which themselves only SPARSELY sample ocean temperatures at various depths, were not even deployed until 2007. And we simply do not have the ability to measure 1.5 billion cubic kilometers of ocean with such precision. It's ludicrous.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
I thought we had buoys since 1950.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.