"Tampered" indicates intent, versus "adjusted for reasons we explain for all to see." I don't believe intent to deceive is in evidence. The Climategate emails do not do that.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Scientists say it didn't happen. Adjustments went both ways.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The data fits the theory and that's bothering you?
6 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
The altered data fits the theory. The measured data goes opposite the theory. Night and day difference between those two concepts.
3 replies 12 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Are ocean temperature measurements "tampered"?
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
I don't know much about ocean temperatures, but Phil Jones at CRU said the historical ocean data was "largely made up." NASA did not even attempt to calculate pre-1950 ocean temperatures until about 15 years ago. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …pic.twitter.com/I6NDnaotmp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 25 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
If
@ScottAdamsSays means OHC, not much there in terms of temps. The oceans are warming at the rate of about 0.2 C deg/century. ZERO POINT TWO.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Is that what climate scientists say?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.