The US has by far the best temperature data set in the world. In my new video and accompanying blog post, I detail how the US data is massively altered by @NOAA and @NASA to turn a long term cooling trend into warming. @ScottAdamsSayshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgk3xFHvWLE …
-
-
When almost 100% of the adjustments have the same result (more apparent warming) you can be pretty sure that there’s some intent behind them.
-
Scientists say adjustments were about evenly distributed up and down. Only the skeptics say it was one way.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Scientists say it didn't happen. Adjustments went both ways.
- Show replies
-
-
-
It's difficult to believe that temps PRIOR to a given date are adjusted down, and those AFTER are adjusted up. The graph showing how the temp adjustments correlate with CO2 increases...would love to hear an explanation of that. (And none of this is proof!)
-
If it is hard to believe (and it is), the usual explanation is that it isn't true. For nearly every skeptical claim, including this one, the normal response is that your facts are wrong.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The climate scientist response is that the adjustments are about equal in both directions. And the reasons for the adjustments are well-described and public.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The deception is very clear. Instead of putting error bars on the actual thermometer data (as any legitimate scientist would do) - they alter the data and present it to the public and policy makers as if it is the actual thermometer data.
-
You describe evidence of suboptimal graphing and communication, which is different from intent.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.