Now imagine scientist back in the times Vikings lived on Greenland saying a day would come when children would never know the joys of drinking beer made with good barley from Greenland because of the coming cold. They would have been right. http://sciencenordic.com/vikings-grew-barley-greenland …
That only happened in one of the reality bubbles. In the other bubble, adjustments were made for rational reasons, checked against proxies, and peer reviewed.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So how are you overcoming your biases? You've seen some of the data. Real records, real history that contradicts their graphs. They erased the 1930's warming, they erased the 1960s cooling which is what they meant by hiding the decline. No fact seems to sway you.
End of conversation
-
-
-
What does a peer review entail? Here is a Guardian article about the ClimateGate emails and what they said about the peer review process before supporters circled the wagons and pushed the “debunked” narrative about the emails: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/02/hacked-climate-emails-flaws-peer-review …
-
Talking about bubbles is interesting, but there is reality and fact. This is where the thermometers were in 1935. This is what they measured. When someone says they are going to do away with the warming and the decline and it goes away then that is what they did. End of story.pic.twitter.com/pD91GstC1M
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You are arguing that instrumental records should be adjusted to match proxies? Wow. Just wow. That is simply, incredibly incorrect. It is the exact opposite of what you should do. As to peer review that is meaningless if the reviewing peers all belong to the group.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure, but rational reasoning and peer review are no defense against selection bias. Unless you believe the US experienced no economic growth over the last 100 years the lack of UHI adjustments are clearly ridiculous. http://www.surfacestations.org/
-
Sorry, that may have been a little cryptic, but essentially to believe there is no UHI adjustment necessary, you have to believe that 50-100 years ago temp stations had about the same amount of asphalt, machinery, exhaust ports (really!) etc around them. Not remotely plausible.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.