Current situation: President Trump doesn't believe in useless climate deals based on complex, multivariate models that claim to predict the temperature of the planet for the next 80 years, whereas the more pro-science Democrats don't believe walls work.
-
-
1. Scott, the climate alarmism camp has been very successful persuading you about their level of certainty concerning the past and future warming. As you say, the way to know who is correct is do their predictions come true? Virtually none of the alarmist predictions in the past
-
2. 30 years have panned out. This is Judith Curry’s main point and a key tenet of the skeptic position. The ONLY thing that matters if the theory that CO2 will cause catastrophic warming is do the predictions come true. If there is no warming in the Atmosphere, then more heat
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
5. I am curious to learn what you find most persuasive about the warmest arguments so far. From your comments to date it seems to be argument from authority, I.e. they are the official climate experts. Which AGW scientists or communicators do you find most persuasive?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.