Border security, the actual choices: 1. Status quo, with 400,000 illegals apprehended per year. 2. Dept of Homeland Security Request: 234 miles of new fencing where they’ve identified a need, plus other tech. $5.7 B price tag 3. 2,000 mile wall, $25 B price tag We choose #2
-
-
No I think those experts are pro-open-border-bushy types
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sceptical about who these " experts" are. Detecting them and " arresting" them is not keeping them out. Basically just an expensive call service for a ride. Even the wait in Mexico policy is a farce and doesnt apply family units, plus applies only 1 port
-
Many of these ppl have cell phones. Publishing a number they can call BP for a ride would be even cheaper than tech fence if money is the real issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I drive by this wall almost every day — it works.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So what you're saying is technology only works with a wall?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But what you fail to realize, Mr. Adams, with all due respect, is that the experts recommended not only technology, but also expanded fencing and more Border Patrol officers down there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Detection = tracking = interception = detaining
-
Don’t have to do all that if They can’t get in
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Israeli fences are two rows of fencing. IDK if Israel has hundreds of invaders at a time. Doubt there’s a catch and release policy; Israelis have been known to shoot trespassers. Lastly, IDK if Israel has huge stretches of emptiness. Example in New Mex https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S024otpADnQ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.