Border security, the actual choices: 1. Status quo, with 400,000 illegals apprehended per year. 2. Dept of Homeland Security Request: 234 miles of new fencing where they’ve identified a need, plus other tech. $5.7 B price tag 3. 2,000 mile wall, $25 B price tag We choose #2
-
-
You can unlock a gate - but they don't want a gate, or a wall, or any other physical means of preventing people from entering.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dems want any apprehensions to happen on US soil to maintain catch and release (plus no ID / non-citizen voting). A wall would prevent foreigners from getting to US soil and triggering all of the legal ramifications from that.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Unlocking a gate is much more visible to the public than flipping a switch. Dems work best in the dark.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.