Um, Scott, that is the same thing. A ‘non-viable pregnancy’ at birth is actually a viable pregnancy. Even if child is horridly deformed, you want to kill it before it’s born? Or just as it’s being born? Still infanticide, no matter the problems baby has. Sick.
-
-
Does it really make it morally better if the governor supports killing unhealthy or handicapped babies that would survive if given treatment? Haven’t we wandered well into infanticide either way?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t. I heard killing *certain* babies is a-ok, which I completely 100% disagree with...and if you don’t, I’m quite horrified.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"if you think the governor supports killing healthy babies" is a heavy conditional. Without mind reading, how do you know that's what people thought? I don't think most people thought that. People understood correctly and found the thought of killing 'unhealthy' babies sickening.
-
I don't know for sure what people thought, but why assume others, many of whom have been following this bill closely, are too dumb to understand the context? While your point is technically correct, your underlying assumption about what others thought in this case is mistaken.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.