What is the climate science rebuttal to this skeptical claim that NASA reports ice isn't melting overall? Prediction: The rebuttal will be persuasive. And so will the rebuttal to the rebuttal and the rebuttal to that rebuttal. #Turtlesallthewaydownhttps://twitter.com/ksorbs/status/1089840188086456326 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's the political activist argument. No scientist is making it. The scientists are arguing over 70 vs. 72.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sustained. The witness will answer the question please...
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
IMHO, your point about "too quickly" is valid. However, stating "millions of years" and "the current climate" is not the full story. There have been much warmer and colder periods in just the last few thousand years, without very much change in speciation.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Run away warming is not plausible. https://twitter.com/clivehbest/status/1090253257727971329 … https://judithcurry.com/2019/01/28/reassessing-the-rcps/ …
End of conversation
-
-
-
This is my problem with it: what is the actual mechanism for this runaway warming (i.e., positive feedback) and why hasn't it happened in the past (during periods of increased CO2)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most plausible emissions scenario say warming will stop well before becoming costly.https://twitter.com/clivehbest/status/1090253257727971329 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.