What is the climate science rebuttal to this skeptical claim that NASA reports ice isn't melting overall? Prediction: The rebuttal will be persuasive. And so will the rebuttal to the rebuttal and the rebuttal to that rebuttal. #Turtlesallthewaydownhttps://twitter.com/ksorbs/status/1089840188086456326 …
-
-
Scott, it isn’t the physics that will help. I follow the debate on physics every day. No answers. You have to look at the little things. MWP, LIA, AMO INDEX, tidal gauges since 1900, papers finding no acceleration SLR, Antarctica & Greenland geothermal activity, SLR started 1700s
-
If there’s no greenhouse effect then there is no significant warming due to CO2. All the rest IMHO is just noise or getting stuck in the woods for the trees. The question is does the physics disprove the greenhouse effect. I think it does.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You will never have clarity from physics. No prob with theory. But what has happened last 200 years? We’re warming. Before CO2 kicks in. IPCC says Antarctica adds to SLR by .04m by 2100. What do papers say? Many feet. Threat to coastline is subsidence. Rates multiples of SLR.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Antarctica and Greenland have geothermal activity affecting glaciers and Ice Sheets. These findings are just emerging. Scientists don’t know full extent. I’m not convinced either way. But take all the little evidence against CAGW add up its cumulative effect. Hard to swallow CAGW
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s a metaphor

- Show replies
-
-
-
Would argument by authority work or will they be dismissed as payed operatives of carbon energy industrial complex

. Let actually dismiss all the studies this way.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.