I find very little in mainstream climate science to be even remotely credible, and see little indication most climate academics understand basic science or have the skill set to do so. Mostly an exercise in self-serving group think by people with a huge conflict of interest.
-
-
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
You think the entirety of climate science failed to notice that their theory implies perpetually increasing or decreasing temperatures?
14 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Wegener's theory of Continental Drift was obviously correct from day one, but it took mainstream science 60 years to accept it. My geology professor Bob Dietz at ASU was one of the people who finally broke the deadlock. Gave me a good understanding of how group think works.
8 replies 22 retweets 66 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
I can see that as giving you both context and bias. But it isn’t predictive of other situations.
6 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Did you watch my previous video where I discussed Dr. Bill Gray's experiences with government and climate academia? Human nature hasn't changed an is very predictable, as you show in your cartoons.
3 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
I’m onboard with the idea that scientists and skeptics alike are less rational than almost anyone assumes.
18 replies 4 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I see all kinds of nonsense being posted by people who claim to be climate skeptics, but if you have a specific disagreement with my observations of climate science - that would be much easier for my to address.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Twitter followers know the score.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.