My latest response to Potholer and a repeat of my challenge for him to follow through with the live debate he agreed to. @ScottAdamsSayshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XycF0uCuByQ …
-
-
Follow the money Scott. Rule #1.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I know you don't like analogies Scott. But I repeat if you've seen one walking, quacking, #$%*%ing critter that you call a duck - and later see one that looks and act just the same, it is probably a duck too.
-
I prefer the scientific method. But if “quack similarly” is all you need, good for you. Sounds easier.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Did you watch my previous video where I discussed Dr. Bill Gray's experiences with government and climate academia? Human nature hasn't changed an is very predictable, as you show in your cartoons.
-
I’m onboard with the idea that scientists and skeptics alike are less rational than almost anyone assumes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You just described science.
End of conversation
-
-
-
If you check out the history of climate change you will find an awful lot of confirmation bias. The 'greenhouse effect' was 'discovered' in 1824 and was just repeated as the 'cause' of warming in 1938, a time when there just was NOT enough information to make any deductions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Steve is not predicting that the group think effect means that all mainstream “science” is wrong.
-
It is a first step to fight the claim that the science is settled.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.