My latest response to Potholer and a repeat of my challenge for him to follow through with the live debate he agreed to. @ScottAdamsSayshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XycF0uCuByQ …
-
-
IPCC report (TAR), Working Group 1 (science part), Chapter 5.01 they explicitly state that the climate science cannot predict the future climate states beforehand because that math is too difficult. See the 10-day limit on weather reports. 1/2
-
I once got tweeted to by one of contributors of that Third Assessment Report. I didn't realize that until after but he stopped tweeting after I linked to this chapter and verse. If 'settled science' cannot predict, their expressed certainty is not scientific but political.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
in Dilbert's world, many implausible events occur because of human stubbornness and folly. The rapid expansion of climate science employment and institutions, together with opportunity for public recognition, has resulted in climate characters worthy of their own bizarro-Dilbert
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
When neither side of an argument can effectively demonstrate their case, doesn't it make it much more likely that there are variables and long-term cycles on a scale well outside of recorded history we know nothing about? One volcano might undo all of the alarmist's efforts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just leaving this here:https://twitter.com/Gerald_Bostock/status/1089905367461650432 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.