Regardless of probability, the FBI would err on the side of caution (well, overwhelming force) when forcefully entering a home.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The actuality is that he said he did not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They could only know if he had a registered weapon.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The reality of the 2nd Amendment is that I don’t want anyone to know if I have a gun or not. If criminals know I don’t guess where they’re coming.....and now I’m trying to picture a threatening Roger Stone with a gun
The danger was so plausible that the FBI let CNN film it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probability high? Based on what data set? And even if he did, what is the probability that a LEGAL gun owner would decide to use them in an illegal manner endangering his family? Nice that he was found guilty of being a threat based on political affiliation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He was "probably" confused.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The probability of a person without permit and gun registration that has been observed for a long time and is aware of it however is not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.