People with law degrees: "Pelosi defeated Trump!" People with engineering degrees: "Border security is about to get a lot stronger." People with economics degrees: "Compared to what Clinton would have done as president, the border will be far more secure."
-
-
Your argument would have made sense 35 days ago. Now, it is just caving!
-
I agree Pelosi took a pawn.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Winning vs losing is subjective and depends on who you ask. Far enough right, he lost. Far enough left, he lost. Those in the middle...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because it fails to deliver on his signature campaign promise. You've been forced to move the goalposts from "border wall" to "steel slats" to a generic "better border security" because Trump isn't actually a good negotiator and can't get what he really wants.
-
You are comparing my completely consistent opinion from the start (that experts should do the engineering) to strangers who had bad opinions. I'm going to block you for that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Used car salesman says what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hahaha. Just proves that Scott (like the rest of his base) no longer believes that Trump can build the wall
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.