Climate science challenge: What is the counterpoint to this skeptical criticism? 'Mikes Nature Trick' Revisited- @ScottAdamsSays edition https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/01/21/mikes-nature-trick-revisited-scottadamssays-edition/ … via @WattsUpWithThat
-
-
What do we do in the face of a potentially devastating catastrophy when there is no way sussing out whether or not we even have a problem? Looks a bit like a modern version of Pascal‘s Wager.
-
Not Pascal’s Wager. Proposed costs are $trillions. But actual costs of climate, while increasing in dollar amount, are declining as a percentage of GDP https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17477891.2018.1540343?journalCode=tenh20 …. Damage costs increasing because we’re richer, not more storms.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The claims aren't really competing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.