Climate science challenge: What is the counterpoint to this skeptical criticism? 'Mikes Nature Trick' Revisited- @ScottAdamsSays edition https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/01/21/mikes-nature-trick-revisited-scottadamssays-edition/ … via @WattsUpWithThat
-
-
There are multiple lines of evidence which confirm the temperature history of the Holocene including ice cores, sediments, sea ice, sea level, tree lines AND -- this is important -- recorded human history! The hockey stick was and remains a fraud.pic.twitter.com/EPUlJDlFZG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most climate scientists don't know anything about proxy reconstructions other than conclusions in abstracts. Here's Figure S1 from Esper et al 2012 (Nature) by non-skeptic tree ringers. Does it look like HS to you?pic.twitter.com/INErzpsKAI
-
I discount 100% of the climate graphs on both sides. It's hard for me to tell myself "This time the Nigerian Prince email is true!"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you take anything they say seriously?? Every prediction of theirs has been false. If you research the history of climate change it is filled with confirmation bias.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott you’re missing the word “some“. There are in fact a number of criticisms. There were also the “climate gate” filesWhich contained emails discussing the data problems.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually the fact that tree rings are completely opposite to T in the modern era (roughly: when we start to actually know T) is fully acknowleged by both sides. Plenty of research to explain why.
-
Here you can see the pro AGW pov on this. They don’t deny the divergence but provide reasons. See what you think of them: https://www.skepticalscience.com/Tree-ring-proxies-divergence-problem.htm …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
From " Tree-ring data, being the most abundant for recent centuries, tend to dominate reconstructions. There are reasons to believe that tree ring data may not properly capture long-term climate changes." Loehle 2007https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/095830507782616797 …
-
the short answer is confirmation bias and convenience sampling. The same problem that afflicts any other fields with major issues.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.