This study is completely fraudulent @ScottAdamsSays
Because "professional climate scientists" are considered to be unquestionable, they know that no lie is too big.pic.twitter.com/kDG9W7BVuW
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Sorry, but the Greenland ice is LAND ice. This makes all the difference. Your analogy doesn’t work. Here is a better one: If you have a glass of water and pour more water into it, does the water level in the glass rise?
Scott, you might want to look atJordan Peterson's interview of Bjorn Lonborg. He lays out how even WITH the IPCCs numbers, the policies being pursued to mitigate Climate Change would be totally pointless and counterproductive. https://youtu.be/prrbooi9PNw
@ScottAdamsSays has always been very critical of the economics of anti AGW politics.
Yes, I will do that today
Looking forward to it. I need my reality shots.
Good analysis of the “Greenland is melting” hysteria here. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/05/01/alarmists-gone-wild-greenland-losing-400-1-cubic-km-ice-cubes-per-year/ …pic.twitter.com/lRffFUq4lQ
Not each, but most time I go check the public data on alarmist articles I am baffled at the hallucination. Last time it was the NYT on scottish island asking for help to save ruins from sea rise. Checked stations around. Nothing. Nothing at all. Amazing.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.