Bothered me some that he so obviously dissembled on the "spectrum" comment.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @RickMcCargar @rln_nelson and
If you can figure out how I can make money by disappointing both sides of the climate debate, please share it.
6 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @FuckYouCommies @ScottAdamsSays and
You haven't learned how cognitive dissonance work. The group that has been fooled is typically not po, rather inventing other rationals to legitimate their following of the scamer. How do you think Mann's still in business?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @FuckYouCommies and
How he's still in business is that his work hasn't been shown to be manufactured as many seem to believe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Stephen90045069 @FuckYouCommies and
Thank you for proving my point to everyone with no horses in the race who has read a bit on the matter.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @Stephen90045069 and
Michael Mann used a self designed method not recognised by actual experts in tree rings and outrageously cherry picked his samples. That happened, sorry.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @FuckYouCommies and
Actually, that's a false statement as actual tree experts have confirmed Michael Mann's work. Sorry but his work is widely recognised by the scientific community. That's especially true in the field of dendrochronology. https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/12/17/why-climatologists-used-the-tr …
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
22 tree ring experts said he did it wrong.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.