If you can figure out how I can make money by disappointing both sides of the climate debate, please share it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @FuckYouCommies @ScottAdamsSays and
You haven't learned how cognitive dissonance work. The group that has been fooled is typically not po, rather inventing other rationals to legitimate their following of the scamer. How do you think Mann's still in business?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @FuckYouCommies and
How he's still in business is that his work hasn't been shown to be manufactured as many seem to believe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Stephen90045069 @FuckYouCommies and
Thank you for proving my point to everyone with no horses in the race who has read a bit on the matter.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @Stephen90045069 and
Michael Mann used a self designed method not recognised by actual experts in tree rings and outrageously cherry picked his samples. That happened, sorry.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @FuckYouCommies and
Actually, that's a false statement as actual tree experts have confirmed Michael Mann's work. Sorry but his work is widely recognised by the scientific community. That's especially true in the field of dendrochronology. https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/12/17/why-climatologists-used-the-tr …
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Stephen90045069 @GregoryMakles and
If it were discredited as you say, we wouldn't be finding more and more proxies that confirm Mann's hockey stick chart. Nor would 8 independent investigations have not only come up with nothing wrong but found that the arguments against Mann's study as invalid.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Do you have a link to back those claims?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.