So you agree with my point that citizens can't penetrate this topic even if they try hard for months? Thanks for agreeing.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @dwtl13 and
No. You haven't "tried hard for months". Back in the day, thousands of "citizens" regularly read Climate Audit and many readers developed an excellent understanding of topic. If you understand stock market statistics or baseball statistics, proxy reconstructions are reachable.
9 replies 12 retweets 65 likes -
Replying to @ClimateAudit @ScottAdamsSays and
@scottadamssays does have a point. It helps to prepare a version for the person that doesn't have so much time and isn't familiar with the jargon. This is approach i took with my sea level rise report https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/special-report-sea-level-rise3.pdf …8 replies 9 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @curryja @ClimateAudit and
My argument is simple. We’ve had much warmer temps with lower CO2 in very recent geologic history, but well before human emissions. Therefore , there’s no way to know or prove if modern warming is caused by humans or not.pic.twitter.com/McMdYc4ElB
4 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @MedBennett @curryja and
CO2 changes track with temperature in both the past and the present say the scientists. No one denies other factors also influence climate.
8 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @curryja and
Carbon dioxide lags climate change in the geological record. They only appear to be synchronized due to the time scale of the graphs. The age of the air trapped in ice is up to hundreds of years younger than the ice itself.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @MedBennett @ScottAdamsSays and
CO2 should lag climate change, in the geological record. In the past it acted as an amplifier, but today we have turned the control knob way up.pic.twitter.com/RPrZJSNNZe
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EthonRaptor @ScottAdamsSays and
Estimates of climate sensitivity to CO2 have been trending towards zero in the literature.pic.twitter.com/Le1jLkismU
5 replies 10 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @MedBennett @EthonRaptor and
Strong play! But given that most tweeted climate charts are fake, it’s hard to know how to value this one.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @MedBennett and
You could read the cited document. http://iieta.org/sites/default/files/Journals/IJHT/35.Sp01_03.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I did. But given that half of peer reviewed and published studies are rubbish, I can’t say I learned anything reliable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.