What is the climate science response to this skepticism about CO2 as the driver? - The Logarithmic Effect of Carbon Dioxide https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/ … via @WattsUpWithThat
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You are definitely right. In 2019 it's more about Neomarxist destruction of society, as per Marx's prescription.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Scott, look for satellite measurements of water vapour in the atmosphere. They don’t track too well with CO2. http://clivebest.com/blog/?p=4517 pic.twitter.com/6jZvDscn0q
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"As other greenhouse gases such as CO2, warm the atmosphere, the air is able to hold more water vapor. The water vapor traps more heat and further warms the atmosphere." This is an amplifying feedback of CO2. See the article below:http://iedro.org/articles/water-vapor-and-global-warming/ …
-
That would be a positive feedback. Systems with positive feedbacks are unstable and yet there has been no runaway greenhouse on the earth for 4 billion years even though C02 has been far higher many times in the past. The feedbacks are negative.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Scott, the effect of CO2 on water vapour is rolled up in the question “what is the feedback”. Here are various published suggestions on what it is. Certainly the scientists seem not to agree.pic.twitter.com/oSnYVTyXhL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.