Way, way out of your depth here buddy. Don’t think you can make it back to surface.
-
-
Replying to @dwtl13 @MedBennett and
So you agree with my point that citizens can't penetrate this topic even if they try hard for months? Thanks for agreeing.
17 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @dwtl13 and
No. You haven't "tried hard for months". Back in the day, thousands of "citizens" regularly read Climate Audit and many readers developed an excellent understanding of topic. If you understand stock market statistics or baseball statistics, proxy reconstructions are reachable.
9 replies 12 retweets 65 likes -
Replying to @ClimateAudit @ScottAdamsSays and
@scottadamssays does have a point. It helps to prepare a version for the person that doesn't have so much time and isn't familiar with the jargon. This is approach i took with my sea level rise report https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/special-report-sea-level-rise3.pdf …8 replies 9 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @curryja @ClimateAudit and
My argument is simple. We’ve had much warmer temps with lower CO2 in very recent geologic history, but well before human emissions. Therefore , there’s no way to know or prove if modern warming is caused by humans or not.pic.twitter.com/McMdYc4ElB
4 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @MedBennett @curryja and
CO2 changes track with temperature in both the past and the present say the scientists. No one denies other factors also influence climate.
8 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @curryja and
Carbon dioxide lags climate change in the geological record. They only appear to be synchronized due to the time scale of the graphs. The age of the air trapped in ice is up to hundreds of years younger than the ice itself.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @MedBennett @ScottAdamsSays and
CO2 should lag climate change, in the geological record. In the past it acted as an amplifier, but today we have turned the control knob way up.pic.twitter.com/RPrZJSNNZe
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EthonRaptor @ScottAdamsSays and
CO2 has no warming potential at 400 ppm, the atmosphere is already opaque to outgoing long wave IR. CO2 doesn’t control the climate. The real climate sensitivity to CO2 is near zero. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/ …pic.twitter.com/08i0HM0uV3
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @MedBennett @EthonRaptor and
.You are lying and
@ScottAdamsSays is echoing your lies. How sure are you fellows ? Would you cut off your arm if you are wrong and co2 does have a warming potential like all research is showing ? We would, that is how certain we are, it isn't 1995 anymoore.#SuckItUp1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
You left out the links demonstrating your point that CO2 is infinitely warming.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.