Inadvertently, I’ve discovered that some of my followers believe there is no “Open Borders” movement. They believe no one has proposed Open Borders. I just don’t know what to make of this. Does the WSJ not exist?? Do search engines live in my imagination?? Anyone? A little help.
-
-
I agree with you that it only takes one true example to falsify. I think, however, that the broader point is that not only is there such a thing as open borders advocates but that its advocacy is prolific. Al least prolific enough to be blatant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought the 'Laundry List' fallacy was when people throw a wide range of tidbits to build their case, where individually they're weak. Eric's list seems to be a list of similar things, many publications who are either in support of open borders or reporting on people who are
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If someone doesn't support a proper physical barrier on the southern border they support open borders. No amount of drones, electronic surveillance, or overly spread thin man power can properly protect a 1000+ miles of open land. We need a physical barrier plus other things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
S: Prove that something is prolific E: multiple examples proving point S: give me only one example Really?
@ScottAdamsSaysThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From The Hill Article: " The people of the world should, wherever possible, ignore these borders, for their own benefit and that of the global economy. If doing so should have the effect of undermining the nation-state, then call that an added bonus."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also “more efficient” is not the same thing as “everyone except criminals” That is a bad analytic conflation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays, the WSJ article specifies full, free, uninhibited migration of people across the US-Mexico border without any immigration limits. That's the common definition of "open borders". Trump doesn't support anything close to that. You are being absurd.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Is it my imagination or are the open borders people not that far from Trump's plan of blocking the criminals and letting in the people we need for jobs in this country?
- Show replies
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.