Where’s the hockey stick?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
The instrumental temperatures (starting 19th c) are the blade, with older paleotemp reconstructions being the stick. The original HS had a straightish stick & large uncertainty—the former getting bumpier, the latter smaller in subsequent studies (e.g. the attached plots).pic.twitter.com/xrcchIKHhL
5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @priscian @ScottAdamsSays and
Astonishing that anyone in 2019 would still be using "Mike's nature trick" to "hide the decline." That graph is one of the most dishonest pieces of fraud and junk science ever generated.pic.twitter.com/yu9hJFVwiW
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 23 retweets 71 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
This is the least-persuasive skeptical argument. It is obvious to me they were just speaking casually about a method for explaining some unexplained temperature data.
37 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @priscian and
Hiding inconvenient data in order to push a global warming agenda is not OK, Scott. Why would you believe the rest of the proxy data if you don't believe the past 50 years? I suggest you talk to
@ClimateAudit and find out what actually happened.pic.twitter.com/WWypgDIbWwThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 23 retweets 60 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Would it be too personal to ask if you are on the spectrum? Because to me it seems glaringly obvious you interpreted casual language "hide" and "trick" as literal while to me it seems they are obviously not meant that way.
36 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
You have come into this CC arena quite late on Scott. At the time there was peer reviewed material showing a warming pause, and they were definitely using trick and hide in their literal meanings. To suggest otherwise and ask someone if they are autistic is bang out of order mate
1 reply 3 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @vdgmike @SteveSGoddard and
Collecting relevant data is out of order? I'm a professional writer, and have also been taken out of context a thousand times. I know it when I see it. This is clearly one of those.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @vdgmike and
SCOTT
@ScottAdamsSays it was not about hiding temperatures it was about hiding the proxy tree ring data that did not match the temperatures.pic.twitter.com/T92t2U47qB
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @StormSignalSA @ScottAdamsSays and
And another one bites the dust. When the foundation for the proxy data is discredited, some people will ask questions. Can we trust the tree ring data?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Am I wrong that other proxies were used to validate how the tree rings were good in the past but not good now? If so, why aren't we just using the proxies that are so good they can fact-check the tree rings?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.