I ask because it shows this rate of warming increase is typical even before CO2 was the big deal it is now.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
The current warming rate stands out in the global averages. All the global temp. series that include the surface show a strong warming trend since the 1970s.pic.twitter.com/p09DiwWUYU
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
The instrumental temperatures (starting 19th c) are the blade, with older paleotemp reconstructions being the stick. The original HS had a straightish stick & large uncertainty—the former getting bumpier, the latter smaller in subsequent studies (e.g. the attached plots).pic.twitter.com/xrcchIKHhL
5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @priscian @ScottAdamsSays and
Astonishing that anyone in 2019 would still be using "Mike's nature trick" to "hide the decline." That graph is one of the most dishonest pieces of fraud and junk science ever generated.pic.twitter.com/yu9hJFVwiW
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 23 retweets 71 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
This is the least-persuasive skeptical argument. It is obvious to me they were just speaking casually about a method for explaining some unexplained temperature data.
37 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @priscian and
Hiding inconvenient data in order to push a global warming agenda is not OK, Scott. Why would you believe the rest of the proxy data if you don't believe the past 50 years? I suggest you talk to
@ClimateAudit and find out what actually happened.pic.twitter.com/WWypgDIbWwThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 23 retweets 60 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Would it be too personal to ask if you are on the spectrum? Because to me it seems glaringly obvious you interpreted casual language "hide" and "trick" as literal while to me it seems they are obviously not meant that way.
36 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
Scott - that was completely uncalled for. You admit that you are not aware of what occurred yet you make up facts in an ad hom attack. You are on the 48 hr clock.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @clause61 @ScottAdamsSays and
I agree, going on about “on the spectrum” when this looks more like a 2-movie situation seems like poor form.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
It's a legitimate question. If I say something is blue and you say it isn't, wouldn't you wonder if one of us is color blind? Being on the spectrum means you could be "color blind" to figurative language.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.