Shattered in what way? I have only seen competing data based on satellite measurements and those have been explained away by scientists. Not credible compared to the alternative measures.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @kimbetech and
There's an entire book about this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0182I73BA/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1 … http://www.bishop-hill.net/the-hockey-stick-illusion/ … Some fascinating reading. There were massive blog posts on it as well. http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html …
3 replies 5 retweets 10 likes -
And a good book it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It was brilliant. To jog my memory, did
@ClimateAudit walk red noise (close to just random values) through the models used and get a hockey sticks?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
1/ Mann altered principal components algorithm with the result (probably unintentional) that it mined data for series with hockey stick shapes (up or down), flipping them as needed to align. Most of his proxy data was "uninteresting", but stripbark bristlecone tree rings had ...
1 reply 6 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @ClimateAudit @Natskis and
2/ a HS shape- believed by specialists to be unrelated to temperature. Mann's method heavily weighted these bristlecones. But no reason to believe that stripbark was unique world thermometer. 2006 NAS panel said to "avoid" stripbark, but Mann and others still use it to "prove" HS
2 replies 5 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ClimateAudit @Natskis and
Bristle cone only provide a shape analogous to Holocene cooling, the blade was modern thermometer readings appropriately flattened, magnified and added. That’s what is described as “Mann’s trick” in the UEA emails.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @keanfei47 @Natskis and
Climate Audit blog is the only location where you can get an accurate technical exposition of how Mike's Nature trick connects to "hide the decline" and other stunts by the Team. See, for example,https://climateaudit.org/2011/03/29/keiths-science-trick-mikes-nature-trick-and-phils-combo/ …
1 reply 5 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @ClimateAudit @keanfei47 and
Do you have a source that doesn't look like impenetrable nonsense?
10 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ClimateAudit and
The bottom line, Scott, is that the proxies & methods used by Mann et. al. to create the Hockey Stick were flawed. The intent was to rewrite known climate history to support the AGW narrative. The details are well known and thoroughly documented at
@climateaudit and elsewhere.1 reply 4 retweets 10 likes
Intent is not in evidence. We only see actions, which correspond to how someone would act if they believed their own theory.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ClimateAudit and
It is not enough to believe one's own theory. Scientists are charged with the responsibility to act ethically, supporting theory w/ evidence while disclosing methods & potentially contradictory data. You really need to delve deeper into the history to understand what happened.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.