Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 6 Jan 2019
      Replying to @inthepitts @johnbburg and

      The hockey stick measurements are wrong?

      9 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
    2. This Tweet is unavailable.
    3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 6 Jan 2019
      Replying to @kimbetech @inthepitts and

      Shattered in what way? I have only seen competing data based on satellite measurements and those have been explained away by scientists. Not credible compared to the alternative measures.

      12 replies 3 retweets 2 likes
    4. Nate‏ @Natskis 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @kimbetech and

      There's an entire book about this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0182I73BA/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1 … http://www.bishop-hill.net/the-hockey-stick-illusion/ … Some fascinating reading. There were massive blog posts on it as well. http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html …

      3 replies 5 retweets 10 likes
    5. Jack Eddyfier‏ @swcrisis 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Natskis @tan123 and

      And a good book it is.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. Nate‏ @Natskis 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @swcrisis @tan123 and

      It was brilliant. To jog my memory, did @ClimateAudit walk red noise (close to just random values) through the models used and get a hockey sticks?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Natskis @swcrisis and

      1/ Mann altered principal components algorithm with the result (probably unintentional) that it mined data for series with hockey stick shapes (up or down), flipping them as needed to align. Most of his proxy data was "uninteresting", but stripbark bristlecone tree rings had ...

      1 reply 6 retweets 10 likes
    8. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ClimateAudit @Natskis and

      2/ a HS shape- believed by specialists to be unrelated to temperature. Mann's method heavily weighted these bristlecones. But no reason to believe that stripbark was unique world thermometer. 2006 NAS panel said to "avoid" stripbark, but Mann and others still use it to "prove" HS

      2 replies 5 retweets 8 likes
    9. Alfred W Croucher‏ @keanfei47 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ClimateAudit @Natskis and

      Bristle cone only provide a shape analogous to Holocene cooling, the blade was modern thermometer readings appropriately flattened, magnified and added. That’s what is described as “Mann’s trick” in the UEA emails.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 10 Jan 2019
      Replying to @keanfei47 @Natskis and

      Climate Audit blog is the only location where you can get an accurate technical exposition of how Mike's Nature trick connects to "hide the decline" and other stunts by the Team. See, for example,https://climateaudit.org/2011/03/29/keiths-science-trick-mikes-nature-trick-and-phils-combo/ …

      1 reply 5 retweets 17 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 16 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ClimateAudit @keanfei47 and

      Do you have a source that doesn't look like impenetrable nonsense?

      6:07 AM - 16 Jan 2019
      • 3 Likes
      • Kevin Watson Charles Martel Deplorable Chump Russ🇺🇸
      10 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        1. Fartel Engelbert‏ @fartelengelbert 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ClimateAudit and

          Read the book by @aDissentient

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. This Tweet is unavailable.
        3. Show replies
        1. chuckrr‏ @chuckerenno 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ClimateAudit and

          The Hockey Stick Illusion puts it in more layman friendly terms.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @kimbetech @ClimateAudit and

          It's too poorly presented to penetrate.

          5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Show replies
        1. Tony Brouwer‏ @tbrouwer 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ClimateAudit and

          @iowahawkblog has a great explainer on the hockey stick graph for motivated lay peoplehttps://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/12/fables-of-the-reconstruction.html …

          0 replies 6 retweets 5 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Spence on Science‏ @SciSpen 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ClimateAudit and

          1/2 My take: temperature reconstructions are very unreliable and disagree with one another. Here are the collection of reconstructions by mainstream scientists, curated by Wikipedia. I've added the dashed brown bars to indicate the vertical extent of the reconstructions:pic.twitter.com/Us5Z2KLwTQ

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Spence on Science‏ @SciSpen 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @SciSpen @ScottAdamsSays and

          2/2 note: 1. NONE of the reconstructions show the modern era warmth. Why would they show previous warmth? 2. The disagreement between reconstructions is nearly as large as their entire vertical extent! The only conclusion that can be drawn is this field needs more work!pic.twitter.com/fd3zdRBwmZ

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @keanfei47 and

          there was and remains a lot of disinformation about "Mike's Nature trick" and "hide the decline". The blog article was anything but nonsense. It provided a technical explanation appropriate to audience of the blog, most of whom were familiar with issues.

          1 reply 4 retweets 16 likes
        3. Watts Up With That‏ @wattsupwiththat 16 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ClimateAudit @ScottAdamsSays and

          Steve McIntyre @ClimateAudit is speaking truth here. "Mikes Nature Trick" was a Manntastic episode of "sleight of hand science" without a doubt. Even a grade school kid could understand it. People that say otherwise are simply protectionists for the entrenched climate cabal.

          0 replies 5 retweets 16 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info