Which version of climate change reality is true? Hockey stick graph is real: https://bit.ly/2VV8Pxh Hockey stick is debunked: https://bit.ly/2DaPRv7 Hockey stick confirmed multiple times:https://bit.ly/2nc17O5
-
-
climate is the zombie of intellectual discourse: no matter how many times AGW is disproved, it rises again as the basis for someone's political agenda. So while I agree with your reply, it is not something I had not already learnt + why I ceased active blogging about a tautology
-
AGW disproved? When did this happen?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And the certainty of research scientists who chase the "global warming" grant money coming up with "AGW" as the correct answer is guaranteed. The game is rigged. Though mostly not intentionally.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They are fully vested. Climate is a $72 billion per year industry. The language is no longer AGW but mitigation of catastrophic events. Avoid the premise + focus on self perpetuation of a presumptive crisis. Smear any dissent. Never under-estimate ideological self interest.
- Show replies
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays But McIntyre is smarter than that. He pre-rebuts the future responses, re-rebuts the past ones, emphasizes what has not been disputed, insulates careful readers against mere persuasion. CA emphasizes rigor, even InflateGate work solid. Engineering vs science.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.