Ok show me where in any paper they did this.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
I guess we're still voting even though the science is settled.
-
Scott’s the leading
#trumpcuck
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Over-interpreted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read the report commissioned on it in 2006. https://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/WegmanReport.pdf … In what sense can statistics be considered "real". Stats don't represent real things but can give useful or misleading information.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since I don't know squat about science, I'm going to go with the more reliable source. I'm familiar with how Wikipedia includes editors with many different points of view who then hash out their points backed up by reliable sources. So I'm going with Wikipedia on this one.
-
I assume this was tongue in cheek. Wikipedia is famous for suppressing dissent on climate change issues. The relevant pages are closely monitored and controlled.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We live in Key West a former coral atoll. About 10,000 years ago there was a grouper living in my house. We're pretty sure 10,000 years from now the grouper will move back in and we're pretty sure "humans" won't have anything to do with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.