@ScottAdamsSays did just retweet this though so there is some hope he may still be sceptic.https://twitter.com/KaitMarieox/status/1084196286461546496 …
-
0:39 -
Replying to @StormSignalSA @HeisenbergErwin and
I'm skeptical of both sides. It's fairly obvious at this point that a substantial amount of argument from both sides is absurd. I just don't know the percentages.
40 replies 1 retweet 32 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @StormSignalSA and
I would like the alarmist side to provide some empirical evidence the layman can see and understand that the climate is changing beyond what would be natural and if it is ,is it going to be harmful or beneficial
8 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Alan_jones55 @StormSignalSA and
The rate of warming is the argument. And they have shown that in a number of ways.
23 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @StormSignalSA and
In the US (which has by far the best data set in the world) - 100% of warming over the past century is due to data tampering. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/10/noaa-data-tampering-update/ …pic.twitter.com/QZow5bpnRk
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
9 replies 56 retweets 98 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
It's even better when you calculate the averages correctly. Note how the 1930s aren't warmer than now even in the raw data.pic.twitter.com/RTgDzXvbd2
7 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @priscian @SteveSGoddard and
I ask because it shows this rate of warming increase is typical even before CO2 was the big deal it is now.
5 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
The current warming rate stands out in the global averages. All the global temp. series that include the surface show a strong warming trend since the 1970s.pic.twitter.com/p09DiwWUYU
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
The instrumental temperatures (starting 19th c) are the blade, with older paleotemp reconstructions being the stick. The original HS had a straightish stick & large uncertainty—the former getting bumpier, the latter smaller in subsequent studies (e.g. the attached plots).pic.twitter.com/xrcchIKHhL
5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
is this telling me the current rate of increase is historically common, but not how long that rate of increase has so far lasted? That's what I see.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.