Yeah it is disappointing when debate gets shut down. Always ironic that the CCComms awards seem based on how many sceptics are blocked and minds left unchanged.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @StormSignalSA @HeisenbergErwin and
StormSignal Retweeted Kaitlin Bennett
@ScottAdamsSays did just retweet this though so there is some hope he may still be sceptic.https://twitter.com/KaitMarieox/status/1084196286461546496 …StormSignal added,
2 replies 7 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @StormSignalSA @HeisenbergErwin and
I'm skeptical of both sides. It's fairly obvious at this point that a substantial amount of argument from both sides is absurd. I just don't know the percentages.
40 replies 1 retweet 32 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @StormSignalSA and
I would like the alarmist side to provide some empirical evidence the layman can see and understand that the climate is changing beyond what would be natural and if it is ,is it going to be harmful or beneficial
8 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Alan_jones55 @StormSignalSA and
The rate of warming is the argument. And they have shown that in a number of ways.
23 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @StormSignalSA and
In the US (which has by far the best data set in the world) - 100% of warming over the past century is due to data tampering. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/10/noaa-data-tampering-update/ …pic.twitter.com/QZow5bpnRk
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
9 replies 56 retweets 98 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
It's even better when you calculate the averages correctly. Note how the 1930s aren't warmer than now even in the raw data.pic.twitter.com/RTgDzXvbd2
7 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @priscian @SteveSGoddard and
Is the point of this graph to prove or disprove climate change?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
It responds to the previous plot, which uses improperly averaged data (ignores missing values & varying lengths of station temp series). A uniqueness of the USHCN raw data is its inconsistent measuring times, which causes a bias that's corrected in the final data set.
7 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
My question stands. Where is the hockey stick?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.