Sorry I missed that. On the top of my head (I am on my phone) I presented 3 sources for all the calculations, some needed to be filtered for one specific number (which I indicated, I think)
-
-
Yes, will have that. If you have any good ideas on what would be useful in such a debating tool I am open to incorporating them. Easy of navigation. One thing I would like is for each peer-reviewed paper, could get an idea of how many citations are favorable vs. critical.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The difference between my app and other fact checkers, the users can participate in the critical thinking arguments directly. They can form teams as well. But I don't want to give too much away.
-
Forming team seems like an interesting idea. Might create some productive emulation. IMO to end goal of the app shall always be not to judge but to present all arguments in the best possible way, including main counter-arguments and main address of those.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I also toyed with that a while back. My idea was to try to gamify it so that people not interested in a debate would be incited to moderate it. They would provide summary of points and disagreement and be rated for this by readers. Their rating...
-
... could then improve their visibility when they post as a participant on the topics they choose to debate. As a participant they'll also get rated by moderators (on formal stuff; not content: clarity, politeness, sourcing...). Those ratings are what would unlock moderation role
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I looked at it a year ago but was left unconvinced. Can't remember why though.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.