Who won this round of climate alarm skeptic versus climate alarm believer? See the comment thread.https://twitter.com/Tony__Heller/status/1083713398871715840 …
-
-
-
Data manipulation. https://youtu.be/FH8ZW1vkkUU
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Debunked is the wrong word, as the NASA graph shows approx 38 years using the same method. Compared to 2 in the original tweet. For a longer period there seems to be less certainty, but present day levels are still low: see graphs. But if you know of better info, let's see itpic.twitter.com/pKG0Ev5rFT
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you start by looking at the NASA graph and you wanted to show no warming trend by comparison with the 2018 temp, which 2 years would be best to pick?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yea, Mr. Adams, you know more about the climate sciences than the laggards at NASA. What do you do again? Oh yea, you are a cartoonist. -
#climatechange#sciencemattersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Re: "That graph has been debunked for starting at the coldest year." But it doesn't start on the coldest year. That's just a fabrication Tony Heller uses to fool people. It starts when that set of satellites went up. Page 326: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter04_FINAL.pdf …pic.twitter.com/usAju41I2j
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.