Challenge for those who agree with the 97% consensus of climate scientists: Listen to this climate scientist criticize climate models and see if you can maintain your faith in their predictions. Leave comments, please. https://twitter.com/hcato1/status/1083396127481843717 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
The 97% is a farce. It's a narrative attempting to charade as fact. There are good videos showing how they doctored up the 97%. Also the consensus is on climate change being a thing. Not actually AGW existence.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
'There is no crying in baseball.' There is no 'Consensus' in Science; There is only 'Just the facts, Ma'am'. There is, however 'Argumentum ad Nauseam' Which is what the AGW believers use now:https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/49/Argument-by-Repetition …
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @DoctorWerner44 @dvibrationz and
There is absolutely NO overwhelming data. There is absolutely irrefutable FACT that temp rises PRECEDE Co2 rises. This is what made the first dissenting scientists dig deeper.
@AGW is a farce. It is a "sky is falling" crying of wolf that has morphed over years.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Does it make sense to compare ancient atmosphere to today?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.