Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      You probably answered this more than once, but do we have enough non-adjusted measuring stations to know how the non-adjusted ones alone look?

      3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
    2. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      Absolutely. USHCN is a very high quality network of more than 1,200 stations - many of which have data back to at least 1895. I have done experiments using odd numbered stations, even numbered stations, and randomly numbered stations. All produce nearly identical graphs.

      4 replies 11 retweets 30 likes
    3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      Doesn't the entire argument come down to whether or not climate scientists agree the non-adjusted measurements tell the story you say they tell?

      8 replies 4 retweets 19 likes
    4. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      Look at this graph from the 2017 National Climate Report, which has disappeared in the current assessment. In the 2018 assessment, they hide all heatwave data prior to 1960. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/6/ pic.twitter.com/ErGJp4yMfC

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      2 replies 13 retweets 25 likes
    5. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      "Hide" suggests a motive that is possible but not in evidence. The counter to your claim, I understand, is that they adjusted historical data and publicly showed their work and their reasons. You would have to criticize their adjustment reasons to be persuasive.

      9 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
    6. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      I can do that easily. But why is the onus on me to prove that their data tampering (which precisely aligns with the increase in CO2) is incorrect? In an engineering environment, someone who wanted to tamper with data would have to prove tremendous justification.

      6 replies 8 retweets 36 likes
    7. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      "Onus" isn't a legitimate complaint when trillions of dollars and millions of lives are on the line. If you can bring light to the topic, that's all that matters. The counterclaim is that the adjustments were NOT all in the direction of fitting the CO2 curve. Please explain.

      7 replies 0 retweets 11 likes
    8. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      An inadequate supply of energy in the future as a result of poorly thought out policy, would directly threaten billions of lives. I see no evidence to support your assumption that millions of lives are dependent on belief in the credibility of climate scientists.pic.twitter.com/tOcVpFYdyo

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      5 replies 15 retweets 33 likes
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      That isn't my claim. My claim is that getting this wrong costs millions of lives no matter which direction is the wrong one.

      9 replies 1 retweet 13 likes
    10. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      My argument is that poor energy policy would be catastrophic, and the onus is on the data tamperers to prove what they are doing is correct. Having said that, I can and have demonstrated the adjustments are bogus. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/07/the-completely-fake-time-of-observation-bias/ …pic.twitter.com/UhWSJBfUBO

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      3 replies 6 retweets 31 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      I'm not good a sorting out this much complexity out of my depth. Can you tell me the one-sentence version of what explanation climate alarmists give for the temperature adjustments? Are their reasons wrong or did they implement their changes incorrectly?

      4:47 PM - 9 Jan 2019
      • 2 Retweets
      • 18 Likes
      • TShields George Spiers Lunch77 Austrian Anarchy Stebbing Heuer: Lauren B. Victor fan account Teann Coffee Kevin Watson Sashi McEntee Melanson
      21 replies 2 retweets 18 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Warren Smith‏ @warrenksmith 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          They were encouraged to hide the decline in thewarming trend.

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @warrenksmith @SteveSGoddard and

          But they would have had to provide a reason.

          2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Christopher Gaska‏ @ChristopherTodd 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          Heat island effect cannot be modelled to any degree. (Purposeful pun)

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Med‏ @MedBennett 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          It’s agenda-driven science in my opinion. Climate scientists have been adjusting historical temps downward, the opposite of what would make sense due to the growth of UHI. Graph courtesy of @SteveSGoddard, who has done more research on this topic than anyone on the planet.pic.twitter.com/BCL9EGkAkt

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
        3. vandave‏ @vandave 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @MedBennett @ScottAdamsSays and

          It would look the same if that correlation (CO2-Temp) were true as well. So this graph doesn’t say actually disprove anything.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Melanson‏ @20100Melanson 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          That’s an important nuance. Looking forward to an educated explanation. I believe it has a lot more to do with ideology than methodology, but I am open to change my mind.

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          At this point, nearly 50% of the USHCN adjusted data is simply fabricated. For some reason they are reporting a lot of missing data every month. This produces a large upwards bias over the last few decades. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/10/noaa-data-tampering-update/ …pic.twitter.com/wI6VqB8GR9

          This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
          0 replies 5 retweets 19 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          The other big adjustment is Time of Observation Bias, which is based on the theory that people used to reset their min/max thermometers in the afternoons, causing double counting of warm days. I have analyzed this and found it to be greatly exaggerated. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/07/the-completely-fake-time-of-observation-bias/ …pic.twitter.com/ZRHanPUAgF

          This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
          0 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          I feel an intervention coming on.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Warren Smith‏ @warrenksmith 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          Old but good.pic.twitter.com/SugijWkTHL

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info