Why wouldn't the warming after the maximum ice age create more CO2, not less?
-
-
Notice that the slight increase in atmospheric CO2 from 800,000 years ago then spikes in recent industrial times. This is called the Keeling Curve. The point here is the rate increase, not that it was increasing for thousands of years.https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm the guy who tells skeptics twice a day, "It's the RATE of change that is the argument!" Richard Lindzen says the rate of increase in warming was as steep in 1919-1940 as today while CO2 was far lower then. Still waiting for the counter to that.
9 replies 6 retweets 9 likes -
I would have to see Lindzen's data and video: Was it only from the US or was the data for the entire planet? Regionally you can have steep curves, while globally it may be more modest. Just like my 401K. My trend is always up, but I can get spikes either way. US is only 2% area
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The US is much less hot than it was a century ago, and the US is the only large area in the world with a high quality, coherent, long term temperature record.pic.twitter.com/kGslm4ynPg
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
3 replies 14 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Do climate scientists agree the average temperature in the United States is trending downward?
8 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
NOAA tampers with USHCN data to turn cooling into warming. The blue line is the annual average of their raw data set, and the red line is the final data set. Both data sets are readily available on the
@NOAA ftp site. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/07/noaa-us-data-tampering-update-2/ …pic.twitter.com/nuijKGRhKgThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 53 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
The chart you made that convinced me as much as anything that NOAA is doing bad science is this one, which shows their adjustments to the raw temp data are almost a perfect fit with the increase in CO2. IOW, they're making the data fit their models, when it should be the reverse.pic.twitter.com/pmoVhegayi
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Is2021OverYet @SteveSGoddard and
The counter argument is that this didn't happen, that adjustments were in both directions in roughly equal proportion. How the hell do we not know which of those versions of reality is true?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
You can't prove intent through statistics, but IMHO the probability of getting a correlation of almost exactly 1 between the temp adjustments and CO2 increase are small if it's just due to randomness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Or if the theory of AGW is accurate.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
Why is there the need to adjust if the theory is accurate?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.