Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor @TE3187QMW

      NOAA tampers with USHCN data to turn cooling into warming. The blue line is the annual average of their raw data set, and the red line is the final data set. Both data sets are readily available on the @NOAA ftp site. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/07/noaa-us-data-tampering-update-2/ …pic.twitter.com/nuijKGRhKg

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      6 replies 53 retweets 62 likes
    2. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      You probably answered this more than once, but do we have enough non-adjusted measuring stations to know how the non-adjusted ones alone look?

      3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
    3. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      Absolutely. USHCN is a very high quality network of more than 1,200 stations - many of which have data back to at least 1895. I have done experiments using odd numbered stations, even numbered stations, and randomly numbered stations. All produce nearly identical graphs.

      4 replies 11 retweets 30 likes
    4. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      Doesn't the entire argument come down to whether or not climate scientists agree the non-adjusted measurements tell the story you say they tell?

      8 replies 4 retweets 19 likes
    5. This Tweet is unavailable.
    6. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @adviceforbernie @ScottAdamsSays and

      This is the best explanation for the adjustments in case you missed the tweet: https://skepticalscience.com/how-data-adjustments-affect-temp-records.html …

      4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @adviceforbernie and

      Am I correct that both sides of the debate are looking at exactly the same temperature data and arriving at opposite conclusions (up versus down)?

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Jon A‏ @Is2021OverYet 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      There needs to be a public debate about this issue and the causes of climate change in general, but when one side claims the science is settled, or 97% of climate scientists agree humans are causing most of the warming (and therefore we're correct), it's kind of hard to do that.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Is2021OverYet @ScottAdamsSays and

      If it were 51% on the side of AGW I would go with the AGW program. The future is newer, clean energy anyways, regardless of how sensitive the Earth actually ends up to be. Just to be safe. We may need fossil fuels in the future, why use it up?

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Jon A‏ @Is2021OverYet 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and

      The thing I find peculiar is that very few people who believe in AGW are advocating for nuclear energy, whose CO2 emissions are about equal to other forms of renewable energy and which produces much more reliable energy. The safety concerns have been overblown from what I've read

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Is2021OverYet @JSegor and

      Seems to me that someone who would be afraid of one big risk would also be afraid of another, as they see the risks. Totally consistent.

      10:30 AM - 9 Jan 2019
      • 1 Retweet
      • 7 Likes
      • Kay Lunch77 Kevin Watson AdmiralGeneralFieldMarshal Ryan DeLongpre 🇺🇸 Jon A Ethan Allen
      2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Jon A‏ @Is2021OverYet 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          I suppose. That's one of the ways the AGW supporters lost me. Too much reliance on fear, along with appeals to authority. Discussion of the data and theory gets lost in the noise.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @Is2021OverYet @ScottAdamsSays and

          If you bypass the news and go straight to the scientists, it is less fear (with a few exceptions) and more concern of what they are seeing first hand (marine biologists, science reporters, etc. ). Fear is a good motivator if it is justified.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @adviceforbernie and

          Except there are breakthroughs going on for safer nuclear reactors. Thorium may be an interesting technology which may be both safer and cleaner. I assume future energy will have to have some nuclear component - wind and solar just won't cut it alone.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @adviceforbernie and

          I'm pro-nuclear power and it still scares the shit out of me without a foundation of reason for my feeling. Reason isn't involved in the nuclear debate.

          6 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info