Why wouldn't the warming after the maximum ice age create more CO2, not less?
-
-
Notice that the slight increase in atmospheric CO2 from 800,000 years ago then spikes in recent industrial times. This is called the Keeling Curve. The point here is the rate increase, not that it was increasing for thousands of years.https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm the guy who tells skeptics twice a day, "It's the RATE of change that is the argument!" Richard Lindzen says the rate of increase in warming was as steep in 1919-1940 as today while CO2 was far lower then. Still waiting for the counter to that.
9 replies 6 retweets 9 likes -
I would have to see Lindzen's data and video: Was it only from the US or was the data for the entire planet? Regionally you can have steep curves, while globally it may be more modest. Just like my 401K. My trend is always up, but I can get spikes either way. US is only 2% area
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The US is much less hot than it was a century ago, and the US is the only large area in the world with a high quality, coherent, long term temperature record.pic.twitter.com/kGslm4ynPg
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
3 replies 14 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
Do climate scientists agree the average temperature in the United States is trending downward?
8 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
NOAA tampers with USHCN data to turn cooling into warming. The blue line is the annual average of their raw data set, and the red line is the final data set. Both data sets are readily available on the
@NOAA ftp site. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/07/noaa-us-data-tampering-update-2/ …pic.twitter.com/nuijKGRhKgThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
6 replies 53 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
You probably answered this more than once, but do we have enough non-adjusted measuring stations to know how the non-adjusted ones alone look?
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and
Absolutely. USHCN is a very high quality network of more than 1,200 stations - many of which have data back to at least 1895. I have done experiments using odd numbered stations, even numbered stations, and randomly numbered stations. All produce nearly identical graphs.
4 replies 11 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and
At what point is Scott going to get you on his podcast to correct all the BS?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I resist any format with one expert, no matter which side they are on, when it comes to climate. That format is the problem, not the answer.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and
Fair enough. Have one of the 97% crew and their counter. It would be entertaining for sure. And yes, I’ve read both arguments.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @goblin_josh @ScottAdamsSays and
Consensus among experts is how science works.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.