Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 8 Jan 2019
      Replying to @TE3187QMW @ScottAdamsSays

      It is trivial to demonstrate that CO2 is not the driver of climate. Ice ages begin when CO2 is at a maximum, and they end when CO2 is at a minimum. This is the exact opposite of what global warming theory would predict. http://www.daviesand.com/Choices/Precautionary_Planning/New_Data/ …pic.twitter.com/XJJbvivAlG

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      11 replies 77 retweets 111 likes
    2. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard @TE3187QMW

      Why wouldn't the warming after the maximum ice age create more CO2, not less?

      15 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
    3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard @TE3187QMW

      Notice that the slight increase in atmospheric CO2 from 800,000 years ago then spikes in recent industrial times. This is called the Keeling Curve. The point here is the rate increase, not that it was increasing for thousands of years.https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/ …

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @SteveSGoddard @TE3187QMW

      I'm the guy who tells skeptics twice a day, "It's the RATE of change that is the argument!" Richard Lindzen says the rate of increase in warming was as steep in 1919-1940 as today while CO2 was far lower then. Still waiting for the counter to that.

      9 replies 6 retweets 9 likes
    5. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard @TE3187QMW

      I would have to see Lindzen's data and video: Was it only from the US or was the data for the entire planet? Regionally you can have steep curves, while globally it may be more modest. Just like my 401K. My trend is always up, but I can get spikes either way. US is only 2% area

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays @TE3187QMW

      The US is much less hot than it was a century ago, and the US is the only large area in the world with a high quality, coherent, long term temperature record.pic.twitter.com/kGslm4ynPg

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      3 replies 14 retweets 34 likes
    7. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      Do climate scientists agree the average temperature in the United States is trending downward?

      8 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
    8. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor @TE3187QMW

      NOAA tampers with USHCN data to turn cooling into warming. The blue line is the annual average of their raw data set, and the red line is the final data set. Both data sets are readily available on the @NOAA ftp site. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/07/noaa-us-data-tampering-update-2/ …pic.twitter.com/nuijKGRhKg

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      6 replies 53 retweets 62 likes
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      You probably answered this more than once, but do we have enough non-adjusted measuring stations to know how the non-adjusted ones alone look?

      3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
    10. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

      Absolutely. USHCN is a very high quality network of more than 1,200 stations - many of which have data back to at least 1895. I have done experiments using odd numbered stations, even numbered stations, and randomly numbered stations. All produce nearly identical graphs.

      4 replies 11 retweets 30 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

      Doesn't the entire argument come down to whether or not climate scientists agree the non-adjusted measurements tell the story you say they tell?

      9:07 AM - 9 Jan 2019
      • 4 Retweets
      • 19 Likes
      • Louie Lozano 3countyhockey Jet Burner Ralph L Santovenia Jerry Clement Giovanni B. Ponzetto doug lucchetti Paul Diane Lange
      8 replies 4 retweets 19 likes
        1. Don Lewis  ⚒‏ @dwtl13 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          ...because Democrats look at the same data as Republicans, and always reach same conclusion.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. paul cooper‏ @audiF1 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          Id love to see the data from everywhere excluding the US where the most data is collected

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @adviceforbernie @ScottAdamsSays and

          This is the best explanation for the adjustments in case you missed the tweet: https://skepticalscience.com/how-data-adjustments-affect-temp-records.html …

          4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Dave Andrews‏ @PopsandSunshine 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard and

          in the 1970s, as CO2 was rising in the industrial era, the conventional wisdom in science was that the climate was cooling. Apparently they had not yet "discovered" their new theory that CO2 would lead to catastrophic global warming. But now we are told it is "settled science."

          3 replies 5 retweets 8 likes
        3. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @PopsandSunshine @ScottAdamsSays and

          That has been debunked already (1970s cooling "hysteria"). 62% of the scientists at that time predicted warming, 28% had no stance and only 10% predicted a cooling trend. https://www.skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm …

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. AwakeCanadian‏ @ZaTingler 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @boggywood and

          I liked you challenge on observed sea level rise in five years. The scientists have been failing this test every five years since the whole global warming alarmism started! New York should already be under water!

          1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
        3. Helen o'D‏ @boggywood 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ZaTingler @ScottAdamsSays and

          2013 was when NY was supposed to be underwater - er . . . .pic.twitter.com/6J3uPJfBU3

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          Look at this graph from the 2017 National Climate Report, which has disappeared in the current assessment. In the 2018 assessment, they hide all heatwave data prior to 1960. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/6/ pic.twitter.com/ErGJp4yMfC

          This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
          2 replies 13 retweets 25 likes
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 9 Jan 2019
          Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

          "Hide" suggests a motive that is possible but not in evidence. The counter to your claim, I understand, is that they adjusted historical data and publicly showed their work and their reasons. You would have to criticize their adjustment reasons to be persuasive.

          9 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info