This is a persuasive debunking of climate science debunkers. It covers the most ridiculous skeptical claims. https://twitter.com/TE3187QMW/status/1082633055842549760 …
-
-
There are two main embarrassing claims put out by skeptics. 1. There is no such thing as a “greenhouse gas”, therefore CO2 could not effect climate. Ned Nikolov is the main culprit. He has quite a few crackpot ideas. H2O is the main GHG. 1/2
-
That one is on my hit list next. Do you have a good link debunking the "it's all about the water" idea?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
2. It’s claimed “CO2 emissions are insignificant compared to “natural CO2 emissions”. Salby and Berry et al confuse stocks with flows, like confusing a balance sheet with a cash flown statement in finance. I could expand on both points. Carbon is the currency of life. 2/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right. Potholer54 has a whole serious of videos, the above one was just a summary. I think Peter Hadfield has done at least 30 or more. His new videos, Conservative solutions to Climate Change are of particular interest. https://youtu.be/6fV6eeckxTs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.