This is a persuasive debunking of climate science debunkers. It covers the most ridiculous skeptical claims. https://twitter.com/TE3187QMW/status/1082633055842549760 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here is a link to David Evans who built Carbon Models for the Australian government and understands the CO2 AGW theory as well as almost anyone. He has identified specific errors in the how the Global Climate Models treat CO2 that well explains the significant differences between
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
predicted and observed temperatures. He has developed an alternative model that accounts for the errors and has been working on the theory for the last 7 plus years. http://sciencespeak.com/climate-basic.html ….
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I understand it correctly, if the theory of CO2 warming were correct, one major piece of evidence would be a hot spot in the Troposphere about 10KM above the equator. Over 30 years of Satellite data and 50 plus years on radiosonde balloon data with billions of data points
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have failed to show such a hot spot. This would be consistent with more long wave radiation escaping into space than predicted by the AGW proponents. I have seen several blog posts discussing actual efforts to estimate the amount of long wave radiation escaping into space, but
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
As far as I can tell the results are still being debated. That would seem to be the best use of satellite data to confirm or refute the theory. David Evans discusses this in detail on his site.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.