Higher sea levels, stronger hurricanes, increased salination, Droughts, floods, coastal erosion, and acidification of the oceans.
Ah, satellite measurements, as I suspected. Those are considered least reliable by the climate experts I believe. I assume land measurements do not show the pause?
-
-
Re least manipulatable through adjustment/revision.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Land measurements would show a pause if you reinstated all the deleted stations that were showing cooling.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
NOAAs land-based USCRN datset (designed to monitor climate) shows no warming since inception.pic.twitter.com/AlAZJOYVQW
-
Like that!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, the land surface station data is totally trustworthy. We have no need to worry about any spurious adjustments, homgenization techniques, or consider how significant UHI could be in cities and urban areas.pic.twitter.com/71z41uHyvx
-
Honolulu is 21°N of the equator in an apparently warming Pacific.pic.twitter.com/2IkkscaMYu
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Poor spatial coverage with land stations coupled with UHA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Wow, like true denialist, has to deliberately misrepresent information because facts don't match his claim, Mark starts chart @ peak El Nino 1998 year. Why start at peak Mark? Why not an average year? Why deliberately misrepresent?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.